Data

Budweiser recently launched a new can for its Bud Light product line featuring a trans celebrity. How does that compare to its campaign finance footprint?

Sam Bankman-Fried was 17 when Citizens United was decided. Yet he benefitted from it as much as any other donor precisely because it converts money to influence.

Political donation data has a lot to say about a company’s performance.

A close look at the fund’s holdings reveals the inclusion of companies that do not support the NAACP’s mission.

That probably depends on your political perspective--and your personal beliefs. But we looked behind the curtain at the politics of the companies contained in the JUST ETF.  And what we found, well, at this point it was not that surprising....

If you dig down and look at the companies in many of the largest ESG funds, you’ll find that many have been bankrolling Republican politicians and PACs.

Unlike most political issues that involve hundreds of legislators, it’s relatively easy to identify which corporations had the largest financial impact on flipping the Supreme Court conservative.

The entire S&P 500 had an average annual return of 12.7% from 2016-2020. Did Democratic or Republican companies perform better?

See which big firms flipped and who they support now.

Celebrities are brands too! See how they donate here: